If you haven't seen it, you should check it out here.
Because it resonated with me, I have
Western Society
A widely accepted premise of Western industrialised society is: We want to maximise the welfare of our citizens. A core belief we have is that this can be achieved by maximising individual freedom.Why? Both because freedom is good in itself, and essential for a person to be happy, but also because if a person has freedom then they can do what’s in their own interests and therefore help maximise their own welfare.
The way to maximise freedom, is to maximise choice. More choice = more freedom, more freedom = more welfare.
And we do have more choice. More choices every day – food, medical care, laundry products, cleaning products, cell phones, electronics...
But also things that people hardly used to contemplate: their occupation, whether to have children or have a career, what career they should choose, where to go on overseas holiday ... or even choice of gender or sexual preference.
Is all of this Choice Good or Bad?
It is both, but there are two negative effects as a result of all this freedom of choice:- It results in paralysis rather than liberation. With so many options to choose from, people find it very difficult to choose at all. So they don’t choose – they put the decision off until tomorrow, and the next day, and the next...
- Even if we manage to overcome the paralysis, we end up less satisfied with the result of the choice than we would be if we had fewer options to choose from.
There are several reasons why we are less satisfied with the resulting choice:
Regret & Anticipated Regret – With more choice, it’s easy to imagine that we could have made a different choice that would have been better.
This imagined alternative causes you to regret the decision you made, which detracts from the enjoyment you get from the choice – even if it was a good choice, and the best choice you could have made.
The more options there are, the easier it is for you to regret anything at all about the option that you chose.
Opportunity cost – When there are a lot of alternatives and you choose one thing, you are choosing not to do another thing, and those other things might have lots of attractive features that make what you are currently doing is less attractive.
Escalation of expectations – with so much choice, our expectation about how good something will be increases.
More choice = higher expectation of the choice we make being absolutely perfect. When our expectation is of perfection, we can’t help but be disappointed. And with more options, you can’t help but increase a person’s expectation.
The secret to happiness then is: low expectation. hah!
Another side effect of this increased freedom of choice
When there is limited choice and you make a decision you are not happy with, it’s “the world” that is responsible.When there is an abundance of choices and you make a decision you are not happy with, it is YOU that is responsible. You will blame yourself, because with all that choice, surely you could have made a better choice.
Some choice is better than none, but more choice is not necessarily better than some choice.
If you are starving, having the choice of being able to have food would be a massive improvement in your quality of life.If you had the option to choose between two foods, that would be another huge improvement that would even make you happier.
But if you had access to 4000 foods, having 4001 would likely not make you any happier. There comes a point where more choice does not result in more happiness. In fact, the opposite can be true -- having too many choices can actually result in you being less happy because of regret, opportunity cost and escalation of expectation.
Here is the kicker then.
What enables all of this choice? An an abundance of stuff - resources, money, etc.So if we transferred some of the abundance to a poorer society so that they had more and we had less, it wouldn't just make the poorer society much happier, it would make us happier as well.